Skip to content

Team Workflows

When multiple people work on signals, coordination is essential. This guide covers workflows to avoid duplicate outreach and maximize your team’s effectiveness.

Without coordination:

  • Multiple people respond to the same post
  • Some signals get ignored while others get duplicate attention
  • No visibility into what’s being worked on
  • Awkward situations when a prospect gets contacted twice

Signal statuses are your primary coordination tool.

StatusMeaningWhen to Use
NewUnprocessedDefault for incoming signals
ReviewedClaimed/being workedWhen you start working on a signal
ContactedResponse sentAfter you’ve responded
IgnoredNot pursuingWhen a signal isn’t worth pursuing
  1. New signal arrives → Status: New
  2. You decide to work on it → Change to Reviewed
  3. You respond to the post → Change to Contacted
  4. Or you decide it’s not worth it → Change to Ignored

How it works:

  • Signals go to a shared channel (Slack or dashboard)
  • First person to mark “Reviewed” owns it
  • Others skip signals already claimed

Best for: Small teams, collaborative cultures

Pros:

  • Simple to implement
  • Fast response to high-value signals
  • No assignment overhead

Cons:

  • Uneven distribution possible
  • Requires team to check statuses

If you’re using Slack integration:

  1. Signal posts to Slack channel
  2. Team member replies in thread: “Taking this”
  3. They update status in CatchIntent
  4. Others see the thread and skip

Agree on emoji meanings:

  • 👀 = “Looking at this”
  • ✅ = “Responded”
  • ❌ = “Not worth pursuing”

Quick visual coordination without typing.

Route different signals to different channels:

  • #leads-urgent → High-relevance signals (claim fast)
  • #leads-review → Lower-relevance for batch review

Always check:

  1. Signal status — Is it already “Reviewed” or “Contacted”?
  2. The original post — Did a teammate already comment?
  3. Slack thread — Did someone claim it?

If a teammate already responded to a post:

  • Don’t pile on with another response
  • Consider if you can add value in a reply to their comment
  • Usually better to move to the next signal

When signal volume spikes:

Focus on 85+ scores first. Lower scores can wait or go to the digest.

Temporarily assign:

  • Person A: Reddit signals
  • Person B: Hacker News signals
  • Person C: Bluesky signals

“I’ll spend 30 minutes on signals, then move on.” Don’t let signal review consume your day.

Track at the team level:

MetricWhat It Shows
Response timeHow fast are signals being claimed?
Coverage rateWhat % of signals get worked?
Contact rateWhat % of claimed signals get responses?
Ignore rateWhat % are marked ignored? (High = adjust listener)

Every week, spend 15-30 minutes as a team:

  1. What converted? — Share wins and what made them work
  2. What didn’t work? — Signals that should have been ignored
  3. Process issues? — Any coordination problems?
  4. Listener adjustments? — Keywords or thresholds to change?

“Taking the [Platform] signal about [topic] - will respond in next hour”

“Started on this but won’t have time to follow through - can someone take over?”

“Got a demo from the signal about [topic]! Key was mentioning [specific thing]“

Beyond CatchIntent statuses:

ToolUse
SlackReal-time coordination, thread discussions
Notion/AsanaTracking follow-ups beyond initial contact
CRMLogging leads and tracking conversions
Shared calendarScheduling shifts for signal review